Awards people can believe in.
Aurevia’s architecture separates nomination, verification, public participation, judging and final approval into auditable stages.
Nomination
Self and third-party nominations enter a timestamped review queue.
Evidence review
Officers verify category fit, material claims and supporting evidence.
Public profile
Only approved information is published under a unique profile URL.
Voting & judging
Controls enforce category rules while assigned judges score stated criteria.
Final decision
Scores are reconciled, conflicts reviewed and outcomes formally authorised.
Integrity extends beyond the vote count.
Published criteria
Eligibility, timelines, vote limits and score weights can be configured and published per category.
Role separation
Verification, finance, moderation, content, judging and administration use separate permissions.
Fraud review
Hashed account, phone, device, network, velocity and payment signals support proportionate review.
Conflict management
Judge assignments are explicit and scoring records retain their author and submission time.
Audit evidence
Material admin decisions, status changes and legal acceptances are stored for accountability.
Credential verification
Each issued certificate has a unique public record and QR verification route.
A nomination is an application for recognition.
It does not guarantee approval, finalist status or an award. Public counters, where enabled, remain provisional until the vote ledger has been reconciled.
Read the voting rules